<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Might Bring the End of Hard Disks</title>
	<link>http://news.soft32.com/intel-might-bring-the-end-of-hard-disks_6148.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Gerald Connolly</title>
		<link>http://news.soft32.com/intel-might-bring-the-end-of-hard-disks_6148.html#comment-255978</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://news.soft32.com/intel-might-bring-the-end-of-hard-disks_6148.html#comment-255978</guid>
					<description>Please note that SSD's have been around for 10 years or more, the difference between the two is that traditional SSD's have very high performance but use volatile memory and consequently all use a hard disk as a backup device (usually integrated into the packaging, whereas the modern interloper that has effectively hijacked the name use non-volatile memory and doesnt need a backup devive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please note that SSD&#8217;s have been around for 10 years or more, the difference between the two is that traditional SSD&#8217;s have very high performance but use volatile memory and consequently all use a hard disk as a backup device (usually integrated into the packaging, whereas the modern interloper that has effectively hijacked the name use non-volatile memory and doesnt need a backup devive.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
